Jul 17 2009
Abortion Kills a Caterpillar
While sipping my morning coffee on the patio this morning I came to an insight about the anti-abortion stance. I think I better understand their perspective now.
As a half-dozen butterflies flitted within view, I marveled at their strange double existence. They have a double life not in a parallel way, but a serial way. First they are caterpillars; then they are butterflies. I got to thinking, probably erroneously, that the caterpillar stage is almost fetal-like: they seem not fully developed, more amorphous in form and incapable of flight.
And here came my insight by analogy, perhaps a faulty one at that. It seems to me a human fetus is a sort of caterpillar, feeding not on leaves but on its mother. So to speak. (In the majority of cases, this is a welcome arrangement.)
In my own mind, abortion does not kill a child or a human being. It kills a fetus, a potential human being. The butterfly that appears later is the human being. And it appears not overnight from a chrysalis, but it fully develops, unfurling its potential and personality, slowly over months and years post-birth.
Here’s the thing: when I view a caterpillar as a potential butterfly of one type or another, I treat it differently. Alright, go ahead, use my backyard foliage as your own personal salad bar. I like your potential.
I have been pro-choice for years and years. But I think I can now better understand the perspective of the other side.
Is a caterpillar a butterfly? No, not really. But it has potential. How much does potential weigh?
—
For a bit of recent science conducted on the subject of fetal abilities, look beneath the fold.









