<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Human Sexuality and How Questionnaires Can Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evolvingmind.info/blog/2010/02/sexuality-and-how-questionnaires-can-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evolvingmind.info/blog/2010/02/sexuality-and-how-questionnaires-can-fail/</link>
	<description>driven by curiosity, guided by rationality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 20:14:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://evolvingmind.info/blog/2010/02/sexuality-and-how-questionnaires-can-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-15700</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvingmind.info/blog/2010/02/sexuality-and-how-questionnaires-can-fail/#comment-15700</guid>
		<description>In my own experience I am psychologically easily aroused by pictures etc but physical arousal tends to be unattainable unless I&#039;m in actual contact with another person. (It&#039;s really very annoying since I&#039;m in a long-distance relationship!) So personally I am willing to believe that the subjects are not in fact wrong about themselves -- they&#039;re just not answering the question the researchers think they should be answering.

For good measure I&#039;ll wave my hands and rationalize the result: Physical arousal in women serves the additional purpose of reducing injuries in the case of rape, so it makes sense for it to be triggered by a different set of stimuli than psychological arousal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my own experience I am psychologically easily aroused by pictures etc but physical arousal tends to be unattainable unless I&#8217;m in actual contact with another person. (It&#8217;s really very annoying since I&#8217;m in a long-distance relationship!) So personally I am willing to believe that the subjects are not in fact wrong about themselves &#8212; they&#8217;re just not answering the question the researchers think they should be answering.</p>
<p>For good measure I&#8217;ll wave my hands and rationalize the result: Physical arousal in women serves the additional purpose of reducing injuries in the case of rape, so it makes sense for it to be triggered by a different set of stimuli than psychological arousal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Limits of Subjectivity &#124; the evolving mind</title>
		<link>http://evolvingmind.info/blog/2010/02/sexuality-and-how-questionnaires-can-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-15696</link>
		<dc:creator>The Limits of Subjectivity &#124; the evolving mind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvingmind.info/blog/2010/02/sexuality-and-how-questionnaires-can-fail/#comment-15696</guid>
		<description>[...] a recent post, Human Sexuality and How Questionnaires Can Fail, I concluded this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a recent post, Human Sexuality and How Questionnaires Can Fail, I concluded this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

